Payment Options for Plan Expenses

In this
issue:


Qualified retirement plans
provide tax deductible benefits for employers and employees, as well as an
opportunity for significant savings for the post-retirement years. But these
plans require adherence to numerous governmental regulations, and there are
costs involved in the establishment and ongoing maintenance of the plan.

The list of expenses includes the preparation of plan documents,
recordkeeping and government reporting, to name just a few. It is important
that these functions be carried out by trained professionals who are
familiar with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Department of Labor
(DOL) rules and regulations for qualified plans.

Many of these expenses are permitted to be paid from the assets of the
plan, although certain expenses must be paid by the sponsoring employer. In
hard economic times, employers who have been footing the bill for
administrative expenses may choose to reconsider and have some of the fees
paid from the plan assets.

Expenses Borne By Employer

The DOL does not permit expenses which relate to "settlor functions" to
be paid from the plan assets. A "settlor function" is an independent
business activity or decision of the employer. These activities are thought
to primarily benefit the employer.

Expenses such as the following cannot be paid from plan assets, although
they are deductible as ordinary business expenses:

Example: The XYZ Company established a 401(k) plan effective January 1,
2006. The cost for preparation of the documents to establish the plan is a
business expense that must be paid by the employer and not the plan. In 2009
the company was informed that the plan had to be restated for EGTRRA (the
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act) which was enacted in 2001
and other laws that were passed since that time. Because the restated
document is required by a change in the law and not a voluntary amendment
instituted by the employer, the restatement fee can be charged to
participants’ accounts under the plan if the employer chooses not to pay
that cost.

Administrative Expenses Payable From Plan Assets

If the employer wishes, fees related to the administration of the plan
can generally be paid by the plan if they are prudent and reasonable and
permitted under the plan document. Reasonable administrative costs that may
be charged to plan participants include the following:

One issue to consider when deciding if a fee should be paid from the plan
assets is the size of the plan relative to the amount of the fee. Allocating
a $1,500 fee among 100 participants with total plan assets of $1,000,000
will have much less of an impact than if the plan has only 10 participants
with assets of $100,000.

The employer, as a fiduciary of the plan, is required to monitor plan
expenses to insure that they are reasonable and prudent.

Allocation Methods

Once it’s been established that a fee can properly be paid by the plan,
the method of allocating the fee must be determined. There are several
alternatives outlined below.

Allocate Fee to Specific Participant

The fairest method for allocating certain service fees is to charge them
against the account of the participant involved in the transaction or
service, although such fees can be allocated to the entire plan.
Participants should be informed of the amount of the fee in advance. The
following fees are typically charged to the affected participant’s account:

Pro Rata or Per Capita Allocation

Plan expenses that are not being charged to a specific participant’s
account can be allocated to all plan participants on either a "pro rata" or
a "per capita" basis.

A pro rata allocation is done proportionately based on account balances.
Per capita means that the amount is allocated equally based on the number of
participants in the plan. Here is an example of how a $1,000 fee would be
allocated under each method:

Participant Account
Balance
Pro Rata
Allocation
Per Capita
Allocation
A $60,000 $600 $250
B 20,000 200 250
C 15,000 150 250
D 5,000 50 250
Total $100,000 $1,000 $1,000

As you can see, the participant with the highest account balance would
have the largest fee deducted under the pro rata method.

DOL rules require that the allocation method chosen be prudent and solely
in the interest of all participants. It must have a rational basis, with
some reasonable relationship to the services provided. It may be more
appropriate to allocate certain investment fees pro rata based on account
balances, while some administrative fees may be more appropriately allocated
per capita, where each participant pays the same amount. It depends on the
facts and circumstances of each situation, with prudence and reasonableness
being the primary considerations.

The DOL has stated that it could be reasonable to treat terminated
employees differently than active employees when it comes to the allocation
of plan expenses. This may be more easily justified where the terminated
employee had a choice and elected to remain in the plan, as compared to the
situation where terminees cannot receive a distribution until reaching
normal retirement age.

Using Forfeitures to Pay Expenses

Some plans provide that allowable expenses may be paid from the
forfeiture account (accumulated from employees who terminated employment
without full vesting). The impact that this will have depends on how
forfeitures are treated under the terms of the plan. If forfeitures are used
to offset employer contributions, such as matching contributions in a 401(k)
plan, it’s as if the employer were paying the expense because the reduced
forfeitures will likely result in additional employer contributions. But if
the forfeitures are allocated to remaining participants, then it’s as if the
participants are paying the fee, due to the reduced forfeiture allocation.

Defined Benefit Plans

Defined benefit plans may also pay expenses from plan assets, but
participants’ benefits will not be reduced as a result. That’s because the
benefits are stipulated under the terms of the plan, and paying expenses
from the plan would only reduce the assets available to pay benefits, which
could increase the employer’s funding obligation. However, where investments
have outperformed actuarial assumptions creating overfunding, paying
expenses from the plan may be desirable.

Plan Document and Disclosure Requirements

Expenses may only be paid from the plan assets if the plan document
authorizes plan expense payments or is silent on the payment of expenses.
The document may contain specific details for the payment and allocation of
plan expenses, although it is not required to provide such detail. Plan
documents that specifically prohibit the payment of expenses by the plan may
be amended prospectively to remove this provision and allow the plan to pay
expenses in the future. However, the expenses of this amendment must be paid
by the employer as a voluntary amendment.

Participants need to be informed if plan expenses can be deducted from
their accounts. Such information should be included in the Summary Plan
Description (SPD) which is required to be distributed to each employee upon
entering the plan. Specific details including the amount of and method for
allocating the various types of expenses should be included.

DOL Proposals

Last year the DOL proposed fiduciary disclosure requirements for
participant-directed accounts which would require additional information to
be provided about investment options and more detailed information about
fees. The rules were supposed to have been effective January 1, 2009, but it
is now uncertain when, or if, this regulation will be finalized.

Another DOL proposed regulation concerns the contracts or arrangements
between the plan fiduciary and a service provider. Under the proposal, in
order for a service provider’s fee to be paid by the plan without resulting
in a prohibited transaction, the contract must be in writing and disclose
the fees to be paid. In addition, the service provider must disclose any
relationship it has with other parties that could create a conflict of
interest.

Although it is unclear when, or if, this regulation will be finalized, it
may be advisable to adhere to a service provider disclosure policy to
prevent violations of the fiduciary and prohibited transaction rules under
ERISA.

One DOL change that has been finalized is the increased reporting of fees
paid to service providers on Schedule C of Form 5500 for large plans,
effective for plan years beginning in 2009.

Conclusion

Employers have the option of paying certain expenses of a qualified plan
from the business or from the assets of the plan, in which case the plan
participants share the burden of such costs. The DOL has provided rules to
determine which expenses may be paid by the plan and the allowable
allocation methods among participants’ accounts.

The plan document must allow the plan to pay reasonable expenses in order
for it to take place, and the expense policy must be communicated to
employees through the SPD. Recent DOL proposals seek to increase disclosure
of plan expense information to participants, fiduciaries and the DOL.

[top of page]


The information contained in this newsletter is
intended to provide general information on matters of interest in the area
of qualified retirement plans and is distributed with the understanding that
the publisher and distributor are not rendering legal, tax or other
professional advice. You should not act or rely on any information in this
newsletter without first seeking the advice of a qualified tax advisor such
as an
attorney or CPA.

Articles

December, 2014
Year-End Compliance Testing Overview

August, 2014
The Ultimate Plan Sponsor Checklist

June, 2014
Ready or Not, Here it Comes…the PPA Plan Restatement

April, 2014
The Continuing Evolution of the Safe Harbor 401(k) Plan

February, 2014
Boomerang Employees: Rehires and Retirement Plans

December, 2013
Down with Doma

October, 2013
How Do You Spell Relief? E-P-C-R-S

August, 2013
Cross-Testing: The Right Tool for Many Jobs

April, 2013
When Good Loans Go Bad

February, 2013
Don’t Let Missing Participants and Small Balances Become a Big Problem

February, 2012
At Your Service

December, 2011
Increasing 401(k) Plan Participation

August, 2011
Should They Stay or Should They Go: Dealing with Terminated Participants

June, 2011
Fiduciary Liability for Participant-Directed Plans

April, 2011
Don't let the QDRO be Worse than the Marriage

December, 2010
Plan Year-End "To Do" List

October, 2010
Record Retention

August, 2010
Safe Harbor 401(k) Plan Offers Many Advantages

June, 2010
Roth 401(k) FAQs

February, 2010
Participants are on a Need to Know Basis...and They Need to Know

December, 2009
Mandatory Electronic Filing Applies to Form 5500 Soon!

November, 2009
Coping With the Impact of the Pension Protection Act

June, 2009
ERISA Fiduciary Responsibilities

April, 2009
Layoffs Can Result in a Partial Plan Termination Requiring 100% Vesting

February, 2009
Payment Options for Plan Expenses

December, 2008
The Hidden Pension Trap - The Aggregation Rules

October, 2008
Timely Deposit of Plan Contributions

August, 2008
EGTRRA Restatements... The time has come

June, 2008
Solving 401(k) Testing Problems With New Design Options

April, 2008
Top Heavy Rules May Impact Plan Design

February, 2008
Understanding 401(k) ADP and ACP Testing

December, 2007
Default Investment Rules Facilitate Auto Enrollment

October, 2007
Compensation: Definitions and Applications

August, 2007
Keeping Abreast of Plan Limitations

June, 2007
Keeping Up To Date With Form 5500 Requirements

April, 2007
The Prudent 401(k) Fiduciary

February, 2007
Plan Compliance Update for 2007

December, 2006
Participant Cruise Control: Automatic Enrollment

October, 2006
Pension Protection Act of 2006 Reinforces Private Pension System

August, 2006
Retirement Plan Coverage for Part-Time Employees

June, 2006
Hardship Distributions Provide Valuable Option

April, 2006
Military Leave Rules for Retirement Plans

February, 2006
Responsibilities of a Plan Sponsor

December, 2005
A Primer on Qualified Plan Document Maintenance

October, 2005
The Plain Truth About "Simple" Retirement Plans

August, 2005
New Retirement Plan Option Coming in 2006: The Roth 401(k)!

June, 2005
Safe Harbor 401(k) Plans Provide Smooth Sailing

April, 2005
Guide to Distributions From 401(k) Plans

February, 2005
IRS Issues Final 401(k) Regulations

December, 2004
DOL Provides Guidance for Automatic Rollovers and Lost Participants

October, 2004
Participant-Directed Account Liability

August, 2004
Keeping Plan Records

June, 2004
Dividing Retirement Benefits in Divorce

April, 2004
Keeping Plans in Compliance

February, 2004
Five Reasons to Sponsor a Qualified Plan

December, 2003
Timing of Plan Contributions